Political Correctness GO FUCK YOURSELF!

RAGE.

OUTRAGE.

and more RAGE.

Ok, I am TOTALLY sick of it.

POLITICAL CORRECTNESS

GO FUCK YOURSELF!

The whole concept needs to FUCK OFF!

So for all the idiots lucky enough to have never heard of this shit (or maybe not have it all spelled out for you), heres the deal.

Political correctness (PC or politically correct) is a term used to describe language, ideas, policies, or behavior seen as seeking to minimize offense to racial, cultural, or other identity groups. The term is also used in a broader sense to describe adherence to any political or cultural orthodoxy. Conversely, the term politically incorrect is used to refer to language or ideas that may cause offense; or that are unconstrained by orthodoxy.

Now some motherfuckers (usually on the political left) have argued that the term “political correctness” is a straw man invented by the New Right to discredit progressive social change, especially around issues of race and gender.

This is just a modern version of fascism. Do not tell me what to say. Do not tell me what to do. Do not tell me what to think.

I agree, there is a socially constructed reality. I agree that children can be detrimentally altered by negative stereotypes. But I do NOT agree that the controlling of etnic images or the supervision of manufactured images is an answer to the perceived negative effects.

Some members of identity groups embrace terms that others may seek to change. Some American Indians take pride in the representation of their images as sports mascots. Many deaf people in fact find the PC term “hearing impaired” to be derogatory while at the same time taking pride and identity in the politically IN-correct term “deaf”. These days I don’t even know what to call a black person. Are you an ‘african-american’ or a ‘black’ or a ‘nigger’? All three terms are used almost interchangably within the identity group both as a point of pride and as insult. In this case terms selected by an identity group as more acceptable descriptors will then pass into common use, including use by people whose attitudes are those formerly associated with words which the new terms were designed to supersede. The new terms thus become devalued, and a further set of expressions must be coined. This can give rise to lengthy progressions that derail the intention of ‘political correctness’ by creating confusion and animosity in the absence of an ‘acceptable’ categorization.

At its foundation political correctness implies censorship and endangers free speech by limiting what is in the public discourse, especially in universities and political forums. University of Pennsylvania professor Alan Charles Kors and lawyer Harvey A. Silverglate, connect political correctness to the ideas of Marxist Herbert Marcuse, in particular his claim that liberal ideas of free speech were in fact repressive. They see this “Marcusean logic” as being at the basis of the hundreds of college speech codes formulated on American university campuses.

Others contend that politically correct terms are awkward, euphemistic substitutes for the original stark language. They also draw comparisons to George Orwell’s invented language Newspeak.

Several political figures claim that political correctness is a serious movement aiming to change the nature of Western society. Thus, Peter Hitchens has written in his book The Abolition of Britain, “What Americans describe with the casual phrase …. political correctness is the most intolerant system of thought to dominate the British Isles since the Reformation”.

An example of the PC argument is self referential and irrational, here is an example.

• Different cultures are compatible.
• People who contradict this claim are blinded by prejudice against other cultures.
• People who contradict this claim are trouble-making bigots, which makes them enemies of the community, if not humanity, and deserving persecution.

Lind and Buchanan have characterized PC as a technique originated by the Frankfurt School. According to Lind and Buchanan, the work of the Frankfurt School aimed at undermining Western values by influencing popular culture through Cultural Marxism. Many commentators, along with Buchanan, describe university campuses as breeding grounds for political correctness. Patrick Buchanan, says, in his book The Death of the West: “Political Correctness is Cultural Marxism, a regime to punish dissent and to stigmatise social heresy as the Inquisition punished religious heresy.”

Political correctness is virtually communist propaganda writ small. The purpose of communist propaganda was not to persuade or convince, nor to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponded to reality the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of integrity. To assent to obvious lies is to co-operate with evil, and in some small way to become evil oneself. One’s standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and even destroyed. A society of emasculated liars is easy to control.

Opponents of mainstream scientific views on evolution and other issues have claimed that political correctness is responsible for the failure of their views to get a fair hearing. Thus Ted Steele, an associate university professor of biology, says, in his book, Lamarck’s Signature: “We now stand on the threshold of what could be an exciting new era of genetic research. … However, the ‘politically correct’ thought agendas of the neo-Darwininists of the 1990′s are ideologically opposed to the idea of ‘Lamarckian feedback’ just as the church was opposed to the idea of evolution based on natural selection in the 1850′s!” Camille Paglia, a self-described “libertarian Democrat,” argues that political correctness gives more power to the Left’s enemies and alienates the masses against feminism.

Political correctness creates a list of acceptable and unacceptable words and phrases that can be manipulated depending on circumstance. It also creates an environment where people are made to feel that they are being prejudicial for simply questioning ideologies.

Political correctness marginalizes certain words, phrases, actions or attitudes through the instrumentation of public disesteem. Political correntness is a form of coercion rooted in the assumption that in a political context, power refers to the dominion of some men over others, or the human control of human life. Ultimately, it means force or compulsion. “Correctness” in this context is subjective, and corresponds to the sponsored view of the government, minority, or special interest group. By silencing contradiction, political correctness entrenches the view as orthodox. Eventually, it is accepted as true, as freedom of thought requires the ability to choose between more than one viewpoint. Some conservatives refer to Political Correctness as “The Scourge of Our Times.”

Political correctness has infected even our foreign policy. So concerned with everybody’s opinion, so overcome by the need not to offend, so paralyzed by the lack of non-PC options in both speech and action we have become an impotent nation. The conflict in Iraq is a perfect example of how fighting a war with flowers, a PC war, is a failing proposition.

And so in conclusion… FUCK YOU POLITICAL CORRECTNESS! People not only should not be protected from being offended but the complete opposite. Political correctness is the death of liberty. Political correctness is irrational. Political correctness is tyranny.

Check out these web sites to more educate yourself against the oppressive regime of political correctness:

racial slur database = http://www.rsdb.org/

wikipedia list of ethnic slurs = http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ethnic_slurs

Popularity: 3% [?]

Related posts:

1. 1-800-FUCK-YOU
2. Titty Fuck Francie
3. NYE Fuck You!
4. Fuck You Fatty!
5. Follow the Leader